Why is my Talk selected? Reflections from a Program Committee Reviewer

Author: Soham Dasgupta

Original post on Foojay: Read More

Table of Contents

If you are like me, get the adrenaline rush of getting up on stage and can’t wait to share things that you experienced and learned, then submitting talks to conferences and local meetups excites you.
But as much as you are proud and happy when you are accepted to present, normally there is a lot of work before that for the reviewers and organizers to find the right presentation that resonates with the attendees and fits the whole program.
Drawing on my experience as a reviewer for Voxxed Days Amsterdam over the past two years, as well as organizing Microsoft internal meetups and roundtables and my previous involvement with Capgemini’s Java community, I have dedicated significant time to selecting presentations and talks. So, this is my humble effort to share a few criteria that have guided me (and others) in choosing your submissions for inclusion. This is not an exhaustive list but what we see most.

Everyone has a story to tell, but what makes your story worth listening to? This is a question I often ask myself, both when reviewing submissions and when preparing my own. For me, this consideration carries significant weight, as it is only natural for a speaker to share their personal experiences, highlighting what has worked well and what has not. Your talk stands out because of your unique experiences, including both achievements and challenges with a specific technology, framework, or methodology. By sharing these insights, your presentation offers genuine value and learning opportunities for your audience.

It is also important to mention that, as reviewers, we actively welcome a percentage of new speakers, and ideally I (or we) look for you to share your story, how you implemented a technology, framework, or methodology, what you learned along the way, and what your learning journey looked like.

When you are directly involved with the creation, maintenance, or significant contribution to the topic of your talk, your presence becomes invaluable to the audience. Attendees are eager to hear insights “straight from the horse’s mouth,” as your knowledge is both current and authoritative. Presenting as a contributor means you can address highly specific questions, share in-depth understanding, and help solve real-world issues that the audience may be facing. This opportunity for direct engagement is particularly attractive for organizers, as it encourages meaningful interaction between users and experts, helping to draw larger crowds to conferences and events.

When evaluating a submission, I always consider what the attendees will gain from the experience. The crucial point is the take-away, what practical insights or knowledge will participants leave with? It is important to highlight subtle elements involved in using a particular technology, framework, or methodology, such as lesser-known features or important considerations when integrating it with other systems. Ultimately, if someone is dedicating their time to your talk, it should provide them with genuinely useful information and value.

One of the reasons why attendees are attending a tech conference or meetup is the opportunity to be inspired in their hunger for all things technical. If your presentation has this sense of fun and nerdiness, it can be a compelling factor for your selection as a speaker. For example, sharing a project that is both technically intriguing and entertaining not only captures the audience’s imagination but may also encourage them to try on their own creative or experimental journey. Even in instances where there is not a concrete takeaway for the participants, the enjoyment and inspiration delivered through your talk can motivate others to innovate, to build or break something thus making your contribution valuable and memorable.

If your topic resonates with the reviewers and organizers but there are multiple similar submissions, the strength of your delivery experience and history can become a decisive factor in the selection process. Reviewers and organizers typically assess your credentials as a speaker in three main ways:

  1. You have an established presence within the community, and members of the selection committee have seen you present one or more times before. This prior visibility gives confidence in your ability to engage and inform an audience effectively.
  2. When you include a recording of your previous talks as part of your submission, reviewers have the opportunity to directly observe your presentation style, content delivery, and audience engagement. This tangible evidence can strongly support your application.
  3. If your talks are easily searchable online, organizers can independently reference your past presentations. This accessibility helps them gauge your experience and the reception of your previous sessions, further informing their decision. But make sure, if possible, provide a recording link of the talk you are submitting or one of your previous talks, because sometimes, helping the reviewers and organizers to find everything in one place helps your talk being selected as well.

It is straightforward, but nonetheless worth mentioning, that a .Net-focused conference is unlikely to select a talk centered around Java internals. Organizers adhere to a specific theme as this helps attract the intended audience. However, your presentation may still be relevant to the programme if it offers comparative insights between different technologies. For instance, at a Java conference, a session exploring which language features are absent in Java compared to .Net, or vice versa, could be of genuine interest to attendees.

Even if your submission does not meet every single criterion, having a unique topic can make a significant difference. Whether your proposal focuses on technology adoption, promoting diversity, technology for good, or sharing tips and addressing barriers in career progression, such subjects often fall under the Community & Career category. However, these themes can also be relevant and valuable for other tracks within the conference or meetup programme.

When organizers are considering which speakers to select, your location can play a role in the decision-making process. While many conferences are able to cover travel expenses for their presenters, there are also plenty that cannot always provide such support. In these cases, organizers often favor speakers who are based nearby or at least on the same continent. If you are a local expert with a relevant topic, you may be given preference over someone who would need to travel internationally. This is not only a matter of cost, but also convenience and reliability for the event’s planning.

Occasionally, it is necessary for organizers and reviewers to ensure that a particular organization or product company is represented within the conference programme. This is not solely due to sponsorship considerations. Instead, it may be the case that certain products or companies are closely aligned with the intended theme of the event, and their inclusion is seen as a comprehensive exploration of the subject matter. In these instances, representation from specific organizations helps to maintain the breadth of the programme, ensuring that key technologies, products or perspectives are adequately covered.

There are a couple of key reasons why your talk might be included in the schedule for a conference or meetup.
Sometimes, organizers are looking to feature presentations that fit a particular format or topic. This could mean talks that are time bound, such as brief 5- or 15-minute sessions, or presentations focused on a specific subject, for example, discussions around Agentic AI frameworks.
On occasion, there may not be enough submissions for certain tracks or presentation types. If your submission matches one of these underrepresented areas, it stands a higher chance of being selected for the programme.

Special Thanks to: Marit van Dijk, Julien lengrand-lambert, Sander Mak, Simone de Gijt, Kaya Weers, Ko Turk and Wilco Burggraaf for helping me shape this post.

The post Why is my Talk selected? Reflections from a Program Committee Reviewer appeared first on foojay.